Page 19 of 23 FirstFirst ... 91718192021 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 190 of 227

Thread: Pink Floyd BBC radio sessions 1967-1971 - creating the best possible compilation

  1. #181
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,219
    Thanks
    469
    Thanked 23,510 Times in 291 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by swanlee View Post
    The ebay seller said he will rip it over the weekend. So I should have the files by early next week.
    Excellent, let's hope they fulfil the potential of this LP.

  2. #182
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    My imagination most of the time...
    Posts
    1,944
    Thanks
    178
    Thanked 3,620 Times in 41 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by neonknight View Post
    Excellent, let's hope they fulfil the potential of this LP.
    Indeed. Such a wide range of variables with turntable setups. Fingers crossed for the more reasonable end of things!

  3. #183
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    188
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by swanlee View Post
    The ebay seller said he will rip it over the weekend. So I should have the files by early next week.
    Curious to know if there is an indication he has the proper equipment and know how to do it well...

  4. #184
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    402
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Ok so I got the files from the ebay seller and I think it may certainly be worthwhile to compare to other versions. The LP rip is very clean with no background noise and not much in the way of clicks or pops with full announcer intro for each song and is 24bit 96K full frequency. I'll PM the DL links to Neon
    Last edited by swanlee; 01-07-2017 at 10:31 PM.

  5. #185
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,219
    Thanks
    469
    Thanked 23,510 Times in 291 Posts

    Default

    Thank you swanlee! Definitely a worthwhile exercise. It's a nice 24/96 transfer at a good volume. I have trimmed off Brian Matthew (I would not do this for a release) and added gain for an easier comparison to the official version. My first impression is that the official version has been heavily eq'd to sharpen and brighten it up. Your transfer has a warmer, more authentic feel to it and you are right about it being very clean. The waveform looks healthier and the channels are more balanced without the need for any adjustment. Jimfisheye has been working on my transfer of careful53's tape of the other two tracks and I'll pass the links on to him for his expert view if that would be OK with you?

  6. #186
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    402
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Yea you can do whatever you want with these neon, no worries

  7. #187
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    237
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    This all looks incredibly promising. Thanks to all concerned for the painstaking work that's going into this project.

    In all fairness to the compilers of the official box set (and I know they did drop the ball inexcusably on a couple of things) this thread does underline why they didn't quite nail the BBC aspect of the box. The ultimate version is such an arcane patchwork of different sources that getting it right to this degree really is a lifetime's work.

  8. #188
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,219
    Thanks
    469
    Thanked 23,510 Times in 291 Posts

    Default

    "An arcane patchwork of different sources" would make a good Relics-style strap line for our release

  9. #189
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,219
    Thanks
    469
    Thanked 23,510 Times in 291 Posts

    Default

    swanlee - are you able to post any information about the equipment used for the transcription disc please?

  10. #190
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    My imagination most of the time...
    Posts
    1,944
    Thanks
    178
    Thanked 3,620 Times in 41 Posts

    Default

    There's a little curiosity here.
    The 2 channels of this new transfer null down to -55db with no warbling/phasing sounds. (PMATS L ch is 0.10db louder so with that adjusted for.)
    Perfect phase alignment to the sample right out of the box.
    Not a perfect null means something analog was involved. Meaning it's not a single channel digitally cloned into stereo.

    No warbles. Nothing shifted by even a sample (in 96k mind you). The noise (any clicks or what have you) identical as well. It isn't a stereo pickup (stylus) of a mono lp (the noise would be different). I guess it has to be a mono pickup wired to stereo (ie dual mono output coming off it)? That to a phono preamp and then the audio interface.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •